Saturday, July 18, 2026

Bad roads and border bottlenecks block free trade

Date:

The Promise and the Pitfalls of the African Continental Free Trade Area

When the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) entered into force in early 2021, it created a single market covering 55 nations, a combined GDP of roughly $3.4 trillion and a population exceeding 1.2 billion people (AfCFTA Secretariat, 2023). The agreement was hailed as a catalyst for industrialisation, job creation and deeper regional integration. Yet, three years on, the share of trade that stays within Africa remains modest—only about 14‑16 % of the continent’s total commerce (AfCFTA Secretariat, 2023). By contrast, intra‑regional trade in the European Union averages near 60 % (European Commission, 2022). This gap highlights the distance between the treaty’s ambitious text and the everyday reality of moving goods across African borders.

Non‑Tariff Barriers: The Hidden Friction

While tariffs have been largely eliminated under the AfCFTA, non‑tariff obstacles continue to choke the flow of products. At a manufacturing conference in Johannesburg, Muntanga Lindunda, CEO of the Zambia Association of Manufacturers, pointed out that border delays, inconsistent customs procedures and fragmented payment systems are among the most cited pain points (Business Day, 2024).

Customs and Border Delays

Lindunda noted that trucks often face lengthy inspections and multiple checkpoints, a stark contrast to the EU’s “green lane” arrangements that allow seamless movement across member states (Lindunda, 2024). Such stoppages increase transit times and raise logistics costs, eroding any price advantage gained from lower tariffs.

Payment System Fragmentation

Another hurdle is the limited uptake of the Pan‑African Payment and Settlement System (PAPSS). Not all banks are connected, forcing traders to rely on correspondent banking routes that add currency conversion risk and settlement delays (Lindunda, 2024). Ola Oyetayo, CEO of fintech firm Verto, observed that some firms find it easier to route payments to London or New York than to settle transactions with a neighbouring African counterpart (Oyetayo, 2024).

Infrastructure: The Elephant in the Room

Transportation costs in Africa remain among the highest globally, a fact that directly undermines the competitiveness of intra‑African trade (African Development Bank, 2023). Poor road networks, limited rail linkages and inadequate port facilities mean that moving a container from, say, Lagos to Nairobi can take weeks and cost multiples of what the same journey would incur in Europe or Asia.

Regional Blocs as a Stop‑Gap

Lindunda suggested that strengthening existing regional economic communities could accelerate infrastructure upgrades. By pooling resources, blocs such as the East African Community (EAC), Southern African Development Community (SADC), Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) could jointly fund corridors, harmonise standards and reduce the procedural duplication that currently hampers cross‑border movement (Lindunda, 2024).

Liquidity and Foreign‑Exchange Constraints

Beyond physical barriers, financial friction plays a decisive role. Companies frequently cite limited access to reliable emerging‑market exchange rates, a scarcity of multi‑currency accounts and insufficient direct links to foreign‑currency rails as reasons why working capital gets tied up in cross‑border deals (Oyetayo, 2024). For South African exporters, the need to serve both the rest of Africa and global hubs like London and New York creates a “two‑corridor” dilemma: most logistics infrastructure is optimised for one direction or the other, leaving firms to navigate costly trans‑shipments (Oyetayo, 2024).

Path Forward: Aligning Policy with Practice

To unlock the AfCFTA’s full potential, coordinated action is needed on several fronts:

  • Domesticate AfCFTA protocols: Translate treaty provisions into national law to eliminate contradictory regulations that protect local industries at the expense of regional trade.
  • Invest in transport corridors: Prioritise road, rail and port upgrades that link production hubs with major ports, reducing transit time and cost.
  • Expand PAPSS participation: Encourage all commercial banks to join the pan‑African payment platform, thereby cutting currency risk and settlement delays.
  • Develop regional financing mechanisms: Create guarantee funds or blended‑finance facilities that attract private capital for infrastructure projects within RECs.
  • Enhance data sharing: Implement real‑time customs information systems to improve transparency and reduce arbitrary delays.

By addressing these structural impediments, African nations can transform the AfCFTA from a promising framework into a tangible engine of inclusive growth, industrial diversification and resilient supply chains.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News

spot_img

Related articles

There is a trade conflict between the USA and Iran for the seventh day in a row

Escalating Tensions in the Strait of Hormuz: Infrastructure Strikes Raise Global Concerns Recent reports indicate that the United States...

Aramco awards Halliburton long-term contract for unconventional gas project in Saudi Arabia

Halliburton Secures Multi‑Year Stimulation Contract with Saudi Aramco In a move that underscores the growing importance of unconventional gas...

History and a World Cup final are on the horizon when Argentina take on England in the semi-finals

We need to produce an article based on given content, but rewrite as human-based, factually accurate, incorporate E-E-A-T...

How to Spot Norway’s Real Wonders (and Viral AI Scams)

Erling Haaland: Norway’s Unofficial Tourism Ambassador How Haaland Put Norway on the Global Map When Erling Haaland stepped onto the...