Western Cape High Court Halts Public Hearings in Ramaphosa Impeachment Probe

What Happened?

The Western Cape High Court stopped the Section 89 impeachment committee from holding public hearings. The ban stays in place while President Cyril Ramaphosa asks the court to review a report that says he might have a case to answer over the alleged theft of foreign currency from his Phala Phala farm.

Why the Court Intervened

An independent panel, led by former Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo, found that Ramaphosa could be implicated in the missing money case. The president filed a review application challenging the panel’s findings. The judge agreed to pause the public hearings until that review is decided, which is set for September.

ANC’s Reaction

The African National Congress welcomed the ruling. ANC MP Mikateko Mahlaule said the decision confirms the president’s right to seek legal protection and stresses the importance of an independent judiciary. He added that Parliament can still carry out its constitutional duties while the review proceeds.

Opposition Parties Speak Out

EFF’s View

EFF national chairperson Nontando Nolutshungu called the move a pattern of avoiding responsibility. She said the party will study the verdict before deciding on its next steps.

DA’s Perspective

DA MP Glynnis Breytenbach described the ruling as pragmatic. She noted that the committee can still do preparatory work—like setting a mandate, compiling witness lists, and appointing an evidentiary officer—while waiting for the review outcome.

MK Party’s Comment

MK Party lawmaker Andile Mngxitama expressed disappointment but said it was not unexpected. He questioned why the president would fight the inquiry if he had nothing to hide.

ATM’s Concern

ATM Parliament leader Vuyo Zungula called the situation unprecedented. He argued that the legal challenge looks like a delay tactic rather than an effort to clear the president’s name.

What Comes Next?

The impeachment committee will wait for the full judgment and the result of Ramaphosa’s review application in September. After that, they will decide whether to resume public hearings or adjust their approach based on the court’s final decision.

Conclusion

The court’s pause on public hearings has sparked mixed reactions. While the ANC sees it as a affirmation of legal rights, opposition parties worry it stalls accountability. The coming months will reveal whether the inquiry moves forward or faces further delays, keeping the Phala Phala story in the public eye.