Wednesday, May 27, 2026

Tariffs on Chinese cars are a blunt instrument, says FNB senior economist

Date:

South Africa’s Auto Sector Faces Pressure from Rising Chinese Imports

South Africa’s automotive industry is at a crossroads. A surge in low‑cost vehicles from China has reshaped the market, prompting policymakers to consider protective tariffs that could reach as high as 50 % on Chinese‑made cars. While the intention is to shield local manufacturers, economists warn that such measures may treat symptoms rather than the underlying structural challenges that have eroded the sector’s competitiveness.

Why Tariffs Alone Are a Blunt Instrument

Thanda Sithole, senior economist at FNB and WesBank, argues that import tariffs are a “stopgap” response to a deeper deindustrialisation crisis. “Import tariffs are a blunt instrument, and blunt instruments often cause as many problems as they solve,” Sithole said in a recent statement. He cautions that high duties risk masking inefficiencies within South Africa’s own automotive value chain and could delay the reforms needed for long‑term viability.

The proposed tariffs come amid a widening trade deficit with BRICS partners and stagnating local vehicle production. Data from the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition shows that Chinese car imports have risen nearly five‑fold since 2020, coinciding with the closure of 13 automotive businesses and the loss of more than 4,000 jobs over the past three years.

Structural Constraints Undermining Local Competitiveness

Sithole points to several entrenched bottlenecks that keep domestic producers from competing on price and quality:

  • Logistics inefficiencies that raise inland transport costs.
  • Port bottlenecks that delay the arrival of components and finished vehicles.
  • Unreliable power supply, which increases operating expenses for manufacturers.
  • Administrative costs linked to regulatory compliance and customs clearance.

Addressing these issues, he argues, would create a more level playing field without sacrificing the consumer benefits of affordable imports.

The Consumer Landscape Is Changing

Chinese brands have gained traction because they offer a reliable, low‑cost alternative to ageing used vehicles. Industry data from the National Association of Automobile Manufacturers of South Africa (NAAMSA) indicates that Chinese makes accounted for more than 9 % of total new car sales in 2024. Chery, in particular, recorded annual sales growth exceeding 80 % during 2023 and 2024, while Haval and BAIC have also expanded their footprint.

For many low‑ to middle‑income households, these vehicles represent the first realistic opportunity to own a new car. Raising tariffs would directly increase purchase prices for this demographic, potentially reversing recent gains in mobility and access to credit.

A More Credible Policy Path Forward

Sithole advocates for a comprehensive approach that preserves competition while strengthening domestic capabilities:

  • Re‑evaluating existing industrial support frameworks to ensure they are fit for purpose.
  • Deepening localisation where economic analysis shows a clear benefit.
  • Investing in infrastructure upgrades—particularly rail and port logistics—to reduce lead times.
  • Improving the reliability of the electricity supply through public‑private partnerships.
  • Streamlining administrative procedures to lower the cost of doing business.
  • Preparing the local sector for upcoming technology shifts, such as the transition to electric powertrains and connected vehicle platforms.

By targeting the root causes of inefficiency, South Africa can nurture an automotive industry that competes on innovation and quality rather than relying on protective barriers that may ultimately hurt both producers and consumers.

Conclusion

The debate over tariffs on Chinese car imports highlights a broader tension between short‑term protection and long‑term industrial resilience. While safeguarding jobs is a legitimate goal, evidence suggests that sustainable competitiveness will emerge from addressing logistics, power, and regulatory constraints—not from imposing blunt tariffs that risk inflating consumer prices and masking deeper structural problems. Policymakers who heed the advice of experts like Thanda Sithole and ground their decisions in reliable data from Stats SA, NAAMSA, and the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition are more likely to craft measures that support both a vibrant local sector and affordable mobility for South Africans.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News

spot_img

Related articles

The EU is not leaving Mozambique yet as its soldiers are ordered to stay for another six months

EU Extends Military Training Mission in Mozambique Through End‑of‑Year 2025 The European Union Military Assistance Mission in Mozambique (EUMAM Moz)...

Faith under the sun: Pilgrims endure heat on Mount Arafat

Pilgrims brave scorching temperatures at Mount Arafat On the Day of Arafah, more than 1.5 million Muslims converged on the...

Eni and partners approve Baleine Phase 3 project in Ivory Coast

Eni, Petroci and Vitol Approve Final Investment Decision for Baleine Phase 3 Project On Monday, the Italian energy company Eni,...

Households in South Africa have seen little improvement in access to piped water for two decades

South Africa’s Water Access Gains Stall Amid Growing Service‑Delivery Challenges The latest Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) General Household...