Tuesday, May 26, 2026

Alexkor faces R500m claim after court losses

Date:

A Massive Legal Battle Over Diamond Land

What Happened?

A state-owned diamond company called Alexkor and its partner, the Richtersveld Mining Company (RMC), are now facing a huge R500 million lawsuit. The claim comes from another mining company, Vast Mineral Sands (VMS).

The fight started because Alexkor wouldn’t let VMS onto a huge piece of land—over 82,000 hectares of sand dunes—in the Richtersveld area of the Northern Cape. VMS had the legal right to explore (prospect) for valuable minerals there since 2018.

The Big Damages Claim

In 2025, VMS sent a legal letter demanding R520 million in damages. They say Alexkor’s refusal to let them on the land caused massive problems.

An actuary (a financial expert) broke down the claimed damages:

  • Waste-related losses: R72.9 million
  • Mining-related losses: R428.8 million
  • Lost investment chances: R13 million
  • Rent for a building Alexkor used: R540,000
  • VMS’s legal costs: R4.5 million
  • Travel costs for directors: R35,172

VMS first asked for R612 million but reduced it to R520 million after talking with Alexkor.

Why This Land Matters

The minerals VMS was looking for—like leucoxene, monazite, rutile, and zirconium—are super important. Major countries like the US, India, and Australia need them for high-tech gadgets, defense gear, and green energy technology like wind turbines.

VMS got its prospecting right in 2018 for five years and had it renewed until 2026. The land is co-owned by Alexkor, RMC, and a communal property association representing local communities.

The Long Legal Fight

  • 2019: Alexkor suddenly blocked VMS from the land, saying the permits were wrong.
  • Before Court: Two official dispute meetings (under the MPRDA law) both said VMS was right, but Alexkor still refused access.
  • August 2023: VMS won an urgent court case in Kimberley forcing access.
  • After That: Alexkor lost every appeal. They took it to the Constitutional Court in January 2025, but the highest court dismissed the case, saying it had no chance of winning.
  • Result: Alexkor was ordered to pay legal costs in multiple lost cases.

A Split Within the Team?

The joint venture seems to be cracking. The community property association (CPA) that co-owns the land says it warned Alexkor not to fight the case.

“They ignored the advice and persisted with the litigation until the highest court in the country confirmed the views of the community. The litigation was not justified.”

The CPA also pointed out that another company with similar rights was allowed to operate without issues. They’re confused why Alexkor treated VMS differently.

What the Companies Say

Alexkor’s Chair, Dineo Peta: Said Alexkor followed all legal channels on advice from lawyers. “The denial of access to VMS would have been in line with board decisions… taken at the time.” She wouldn’t explain the reasons yet, saying they’ll wait for Parliament and the Mineral Minister to decide.

VMS’s Statement: The courts “expressly confirmed” that Alexkor’s actions caused them “irreparable harm.” They argue Alexkor ignored the legal regulator and wasted public money by losing six court cases, including at the Constitutional Court. This stalled economic development in a region with very high unemployment.

The Community’s Loss

Local community reps are frustrated. The nearly 30-month legal battle meant no jobs.

“There are very few work opportunities in the Richtersveld,” the CPA said. “By now, VMS could have been operational and created work for the community.”

VMS had promised to hire locals and was negotiating a shareholding deal for the community.

Conclusion

This is a complex, high-stakes legal fight with no easy winner yet. Alexkor faces a massive damages bill for what VMS calls an unlawful blockade. The community, which could have benefited from jobs and investment, is the biggest loser so far. The future depends on whether the parties can negotiate a settlement or if another round of court battles is coming. One thing is clear: the dispute has already cost millions in legal fees and lost opportunities in a region that needs both.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News

spot_img

Related articles

What you buy R1,000 for in any country in the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Overview South African fans dreaming of cheering Bafana Bafana at the 2026 FIFA World Cup will quickly realize that...

With $5 billion or more, Kenya now has the largest housing construction project in Africa, says Ruto

President William Ruto Highlights Kenya’s Affordable Housing Drive at the World Urban Forum During the 13th session of the...

ANC rejects invitation to left-wing SACP conference, says Mbalula

ANC Declines Invitation to SACP Left‑Wing Conference Amid Growing Alliance Tensions The African National Congress (ANC) has turned down...

Senegal’s Sonko criticizes appointment as prime minister in his first speech as speaker

Ousmane Sonko’s First Public Remarks as Senegal’s National Assembly Speaker Shortly after being sworn in as speaker of Senegal’s...