Background of the Dispute
ANC National Executive Committee member Nkosazana Dlamini‑Zuma filed an opposing affidavit in a defamation case brought by ANC Secretary‑General Fikile Mbalula. The case stems from her claim that money was used to influence the party’s leadership elections, specifically alleging that Mbalula distributed cash to delegates during the ANC’s 2022 national conference.
Why Dlamini‑Zuma Opposes the Court Case
Internal Party Matter
In her responding affidavit, Dlamini‑Zuma argues that the dispute should stay within the ANC rather than be taken to court. She states:
“It is unwarranted for the applicant to congest our courts with what is clearly a party‑political matter requiring a robust and honest internal discussion about the role of money in the election of the leadership of the ANC.”
She believes the ANC should handle the issue through its own structures, allowing members to debate and resolve concerns about financial influence.
Broader Concerns About Money in Politics
Dlamini‑Zuma says her worries go beyond the personal clash with Mbalula. She points to a pattern where money appears to sway outcomes in ANC leadership contests, citing her own unsuccessful bid for the party presidency in 2017. She maintains that financial influence threatens the integrity of the organisation and undermines democratic processes within the party.
Mbalula’s Legal Action
Fikile Mbalula launched the defamation suit after Dlamini‑Zuma’s allegations became public. He demands a retraction and an apology, insisting that he never gave money to delegates to secure his position as secretary‑general. Mbalula describes the claims as false and damaging to his reputation.
Previous Allegation Withdrawn
The legal battle with Mbalula follows another controversy. During the same podcast interview where she spoke about money in the 2017 conference, Dlamini‑Zuma linked International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola to a voice note allegedly discussing vote‑buying. After Lamola clarified that the voice was not his, she withdrew that specific accusation but kept her broader stance on the role of money in ANC elections.
What the Court Papers Say Now
Dlamini‑Zuma’s latest filing places her argument about internal resolution at the centre of her defence. She asks the court to consider whether the matter should be settled through ANC mechanisms rather than litigation, emphasizing that the party needs to confront financial influence as part of its renewal efforts.
Conclusion
The clash between Dlamini‑Zuma and Mbalula highlights a deeper debate within the ANC about money’s role in shaping leadership. While Mbalula seeks legal redress for alleged defamation, Dlamini‑Zuma urges the party to address the issue internally, warning that unchecked financial influence could erode the ANC’s character and democratic credibility. The outcome of this case may set a precedent for how the organisation handles similar disputes in the future.
