Gauteng Premier Denies Police Docket Allegations
What the Allegation Is About
Brigadier Mbangwa Nkwashu, the Sedibeng District Commissioner, told the Madlanga Commission that Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi had asked police to hand over sensitive case dockets—including those with J50 arrest warrants—for his personal review. One of the dockets mentioned was linked to the fatal shooting of engineer Armand Swart outside his Vereeniging office in April 2024.
Premier’s Response
The Gauteng government quickly rejected the claim. Provincial spokesperson Elijah Mhlanga called Nkwashu’s testimony “baffling” and pointed to a letter from Provincial Commissioner Tommy Mthombeni. According to that letter, it was Mthombeni—not Lesufi—who requested the dockets.
Who Actually Handles the Warrants?
Mhlanga explained that the management of wanted suspects and J50 warrants falls under the South African Police Service (SAPS) leadership. Specifically, Deputy Provincial Commissioner for Crime Detection, Major General Khumalo, works with Crime Intelligence on these matters. The premier’s office only receives routine briefings on crime‑fighting strategies and does not interfere in police operations.
Premier’s Challenge to the Commissioner
Lesufi has asked Nkwashu to provide any written proof of a directive allegedly issued by his office. Without such evidence, the premier argues, the claims could distort official records and erode public trust.
Supporting the Commission’s Work
While Lesufi supports the Madlanga Commission’s inquiry, he insists that any misleading statements will be corrected through proper legal channels. He also urged all stakeholders to avoid sensationalism and let the commission finish its work without interference.
Conclusion
The controversy centers on whether the premier overstepped his role by requesting police dockets. Lesufi denies the accusation, citing a letter that places the request with the provincial police commissioner. He demands concrete evidence before accepting the claims and emphasizes respect for the separation of powers between political leadership and police operations. As the Madlanga Commission continues its hearings, the outcome will clarify who, if anyone, gave the disputed instructions.
