Overview of the Ad Hoc Committee Inquiry
The parliamentary Ad Hoc Committee is looking into claims made by KwaZulu‑Natal Police Commissioner Nhanhla Mkhwanazi. Its job is to check the facts, keep Parliament’s oversight role strong, and rebuild public trust in how Parliament works.
Chairperson’s Message
Soviet Lekganyane, the committee chairperson, said the inquiry must show that Parliament can do its job properly. He stressed that the committee’s work should prove to the public that Parliament is still a reliable watchdog.
What the Committee Discussed
After a day of talks with all the political parties, the committee wrapped up its preliminary discussions on Wednesday.
Input from Political Parties
Each party gave its thoughts on the early draft report. Most members agreed with the main points made by the evidence leaders and the content team, but they also noted where extra details were needed.
Draft Report Process
- The content team will combine all party comments into a final draft.
- That final draft should be ready by Monday.
- Committee members will get time to read it before the Wednesday meeting, when the report is expected to be adopted.
Views from Party Whips
ANC Chief Whip’s Take
Mdumiseni Ntuli, the ANC chief whip, said the final draft should clearly show where the parties agreed and where they disagreed. He added that dealing with those differences will be urgent.
DA and ActionSA Perspectives
- Glynnis Breytenbach (DA) argued that internal issues should stay internal; the committee can talk about successes and lessons without airing every shortcoming publicly.
- Dereleen James (ActionSA) said the recommendations should aim to boost public confidence rather than highlight the committee’s weaknesses.
EFF’s Request for Resources
Leigh-Ann Mathys (EFF) pointed out that the committee asked the Office of the National Assembly Speaker, Thoko Didiza, for a forensic investigator and psycho‑social support for witnesses. She said those resources were not provided, which she believes should be noted in the report.
Response from Committee Leadership
Lekganyane replied that the committee had asked Didiza’s office about a forensic investigator and was told one of the evidence leaders already had the needed skills. He admitted the committee might not have clearly stated where such services were required.
Next Steps and What Happens After the Report
- Once the draft report is adopted, it will be sent to the people involved for their comments.
- They will have 10 days to give feedback.
- The committee will use that input to shape the final recommendations, but it will not be pressured into any particular outcome.
- The committee will also look at additional evidence, such as statements from MK Party MP Vusi Shongwe and issues related to the plea bargain involving Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala.
Conclusion
The Ad Hoc Committee is working hard to make sure its investigation is fair, thorough, and transparent. By listening to all parties, clarifying what resources are needed, and planning clear next steps, the committee hopes to strengthen Parliament’s role as an overseer and restore faith in its ability to serve the public.
